Digital Sovereignty 2026: Comparing Tucan.ai, SpeechMind, and Sally.io

In 2026, automated AI meeting transcription is the standard for German authorities and businesses. However, as efficiency increases, so do the requirements for data protection. Who offers true digital sovereignty? In this post, we compare three heavyweights: Tucan.ai, SpeechMind, and Sally.io.

Why Server Location Alone Is No Longer Enough

For municipalities and critical infrastructure (KRITIS) companies, "hosting in Germany" is often the first criterion. But legally, there is a trap: the US CLOUD Act. If a provider uses US infrastructure (such as AWS or Azure), US authorities can demand access to data – even if the servers are located in Frankfurt.

This is where the difference becomes clear.

Feature Tucan.ai SpeechMind Sally.io
Infrastructure 100% German (Hetzner) OVH Cloud US-Cloud (Azure)
CLOUD Act Protection Fully Immune Residual Risk Residual Risk
On-Premise Yes No No
Specialization Admin / Legal / KRITIS Business / Projects Sales / CRM
Accessibility BITV 2.0 / WCAG Standard Standard

Tucan.ai: The Champion for Government and High Security

Tucan.ai has established itself as the market leader for all organizations that cannot afford to compromise on security.

1. Absolute Legal Certainty through German Ownership

Since Tucan.ai operates on Hetzner servers (a purely German company), the platform is immune to the US CLOUD Act. Your data remains under German jurisdiction. In contrast, SpeechMind and Sally.io use US cloud providers, which can lead to compliance hurdles in sensitive administrative sectors.

2. On-Premise: The "Fortress" for Your Data

While SpeechMind and Sally.io are pure cloud solutions (SaaS), Tucan.ai offers an On-Premise version. Authorities can run the AI in their own data center. The data never leaves the premises – the ultimate in sovereignty.

3. Tailored Protocols: Agenda Items (TOPs)

For public administration, simple continuous text is useless. Tucan.ai understands the structure of council meetings and automatically organizes transcripts according to agenda items (TOPs). In addition, academic titles and party affiliations are correctly recorded – a feature lacking in the more commercially oriented tools SpeechMind and Sally.io.

Conclusion: Which Solution is Right for You?

SpeechMind is a modern, user-friendly tool that performs well for commercial teams and general business meetings where standard AI summaries are sufficient.

However, for German public authorities and municipalities, Tucan.ai offers a more specialized and legally secure framework. With its immunity to the US CLOUD Act, its specialized protocol templates for the German Verwaltung, and the option for total data control via On-Premise deployment, Tucan.ai is the preferred choice for those who cannot compromise on data sovereignty.

SpeechMind and Sally.io: The Specialists for the Commercial Market

  • SpeechMind impresses with modern interfaces and good summaries for project-related work in the private sector, where the strict requirements of the public sector carry less weight.

  • Sally.io is the tool of choice for sales teams. Its deep integration into CRM systems makes it ideal for sales calls, but it lacks the depth required for formal administrative protocols or accessibility standards (BITV 2.0).


Conclusion: Which Assistant is Right for You?

If you lead a sales team, Sally.io is strong. If you are looking for an all-round tool for commercial projects, SpeechMind is worth a look.

However, when it comes to digital sovereignty, GDPR compliance on German servers, and accessible administrative processes, there is no way around Tucan.ai. It is the only solution that combines the protection of sensitive data with the specific requirements of German bureaucracy.

Are you interested into a consultancy call? Book one here.


Tucan.ai vs. Straiqr Scriba: Comparing AI Transcription for German Administration

Digital transformation in German municipalities is reaching a new level in 2026. AI-based meeting minutes save hundreds of working hours, but data protection requirements are extremely high. Here is a look at who leads in this specialist duel.

Table of contents

Comparison Overview: AI Meeting Assistants for Government

When evaluating AI assistants for public use, "hosting in Europe" is only the first step. The following table highlights the technical and legal differences between the two providers.

Feature Tucan.ai Straiqr Scriba
Ownership Structure 100% German  German 
Infrastructure / Cloud Hetzner (100% German-owned) SaaS/Own Cloud (no information provided)
US CLOUD Act Immunity Fully Provided No information provided
On-Premise Solution Yes (Proven & Isolated) Yes
RIS Integration Yes  Partial / Partner-based
Accessibility BITV 2.0 / WCAG 2.1 BITV 2.0 / WCAG 2.1
Metadata (Titles/Party) Fully Integrated Focus on Speaker Recognition

1. Digital Sovereignty: The CLOUD Act Risk

The most important factor for municipalities is independence from US laws.

  • Many young AI companies use interfaces (APIs) from US providers like Microsoft Azure or OpenAI in the background to generate summaries. This opens a flank for the US CLOUD Act.

  • Tucan.ai takes a more consistent path. Through partnerships with purely German infrastructure providers like ISO-27001 certified Hetzner and the use of proprietary language models, Tucan.ai completely evades access by US authorities. For high-security sectors and the public sector, this "No-US-Touch" approach is the winning argument.

2. Intelligent Structure: TOPs with Source Referencing

The biggest difference in daily work lies in the creation of the minutes.

  • Straiqr Scriba: This tool delivers solid, AI-generated summaries and protocol drafts in various levels of detail. However, these often remain "simple" plain-text summaries, where the origin of individual statements must be laboriously searched for in the transcript afterward. Sources are referenced according to the software provider.

  • Tucan.ai: Here, the focus is on administrative structure. Tucan.ai automatically recognizes Agenda Items (TOPs) and assigns content accordingly. Its unique selling point: every summary contains precise source references. With one click, you can go from a summarized sentence directly to the exact point in the original transcript or audio where the statement was made. This not only saves time but also ensures maximum relevance and legal security.

3. Depth of Administrative Integration

Meeting minutes in a local council follow strict rules.

  • Scriba delivers precise transcripts and speaker recognition and is particularly strong in increasing efficiency for standard meetings.

  • Tucan.ai goes one step further: Through seamless integration into Council Information Systems (RIS), minutes flow directly into existing administrative workflows. Furthermore, Tucan.ai considers specific requirements such as position and party affiliations, which are essential for legally secure documentation in Germany.

Conclusion: Which Solution is Right for You?

Straiqr Scriba is a strong partner for efficient standard transcriptions. However, for those looking for a solution that provides legally secure minutes by TOPs with precise source references while maintaining 100% digital sovereignty, Tucan.ai is the undisputed market leader.

Are you interested into a consultancy call? Book one here.


Tucan vs. Speechmind Logos

Tucan.ai vs. SpeechMind: Comparing AI Transcription for the German Public Sector

As German municipalities (Kommunen) and public authorities (Behörden) accelerate their digital transformation, AI-based meeting transcription (KI-Protokollierung) has become a top priority. However, the requirements for the public sector go far beyond simple speech-to-text. Data sovereignty, German legal compliance, and specialized protocol formats are non-negotiable.

In this analysis, we compare Tucan.ai and SpeechMind to help IT-decision makers choose the right solution for administrative use.

Table of contents

Comparison Overview: AI Meeting Assistants for Government

When evaluating AI assistants for public use, "hosting in Europe" is only the first step. The following table highlights the technical and legal differences between the two providers.

Function Speechmind Tucan.ai
Data Sovereignty OVH Cloud 100% German-owned (Hetzner)
Legal Status Subject to US CLOUD Act Immune to US CLOUD Act
Protocol Standards Verbatim and Agenda-based (TOPs) Verbatim, simple language & Agenda-based (TOPs)
Deployment SaaS (Cloud) only Cloud or On-Premise
Accessibility Standard BITV 2.0 / WCAG
Ideal For Commercial / General Use High-Security / Public Admin
Agenda-based protocols Yes Yes

 

Why Data Sovereignty Matters for Municipalities

The primary differentiator in this comparison is the legal framework of the underlying infrastructure.

1. The Impact of the US CLOUD Act

SpeechMind utilizes major cloud providers like Microsoft Azure and AWS. While these providers host data in European data centers, they are US-based corporations. Under the US CLOUD Act, US authorities can theoretically request access to data processed by these companies, creating a potential conflict with German data protection standards for public authorities.

Tucan.ai eliminates this risk. By hosting exclusively on German-owned, ISO-certified servers (e.g., Hetzner), Tucan.ai ensures that data remains strictly under German jurisdiction. For Städte und Gemeinden handling confidential citizen information, this provides the highest level of DSGVO-compliance and legal certainty.

2. On-Premise vs. Cloud Deployment

For high-security sectors (KRITIS) or sensitive administrative departments, the ability to keep data within one's own network is critical.

  • SpeechMind operates as a SaaS-only model, requiring data to leave the internal network for processing.

  • Tucan.ai offers a full On-Premise solution. This allows authorities to run the entire AI infrastructure on their own servers, ensuring that sensitive data never touches the public internet.

Speechmind Oberfläche

Specialized Features for "Verwaltung" and "Kommunen"

AI for the public sector must understand the nuances of a Niederschrift (official record).

Agenda-Based Structuring (TOPs)

A standard AI summary often misses the legal structure of a council meeting. Tucan.ai is specifically designed to organize transcripts according to Tagesordnungspunkte (TOPs). This ensures that the output aligns perfectly with the meeting’s official agenda, saving hours of manual restructuring for administrative staff.

Political Metadata and Transparency

Unlike general business tools, Tucan.ai allows for the detailed management of participants, including academic titles and party affiliations (Fraktionszugehörigkeit). This level of precision is essential for maintaining the historical and legal integrity of municipal protocols.

Digital Accessibility (BITV 2.0)

Public entities in Germany are legally mandated to use accessible software. Tucan.ai prioritizes BITV 2.0 (WCAG 2.1) compliance, ensuring that all reports can be read by citizens—regardless of physical ability.

Conclusion: Which Solution is Right for You?

SpeechMind is a modern, user-friendly tool that performs well for commercial teams and general business meetings where standard AI summaries are sufficient.

However, for German public authorities and municipalities, Tucan.ai offers a more specialized and legally secure framework. With its immunity to the US CLOUD Act, its specialized protocol templates for the German Verwaltung, and the option for total data control via On-Premise deployment, Tucan.ai is the preferred choice for those who cannot compromise on data sovereignty.

Are you interested into a consultancy call? Book one here.


Harvey.ai vs. Tucan.ai: Comparison of AI tools for legal practice - USA vs. Germany

AI-supported tools are becoming increasingly important in the dynamic world of legal services. They offer law firms and legal departments the opportunity to increase their efficiency and automate repetitive tasks. First let's take a look at Harvey.ai vs. Tucan.ai: A comparison of AI tools for legal practice - USA versus Made in Germany. In the following, the functionality, strengths and weaknesses of these tools are examined in detail to help you make an informed decision.

Table of contents

Functionality comparison

Function Harvey.ai Tucan.ai
AI-supported document analysis Yes Yes
GDPR compliance Depends on data processing Yes
Automatic transcription Limited to document processing Yes
Customizable templates No Yes
Multi-document insights Yes Yes
Integration with MS Word Yes No
Natural language interface Yes Yes

In addition, Harvey.ai offers integration with MS Word, while Tucan.ai scores with its adaptability for templates.

Strengths and weaknesses

Harvey.ai

Strengths:

  • Specialization in legal tasks: Harvey.ai offers a domain-specific AI that has been specially developed for law firms. This enables the precise processing of complex legal issues.
  • Integration with Microsoft Word: Seamless integration makes it much easier to create and revise documents.
  • Extensive database access: Access to global tax case law and case law from various countries supports in-depth research.

Weaknesses:

  • However, the complexity of the setup could be challenging for smaller law firms.
  • Data protection concerns: As a US company, there may be concerns regarding the GDPR.

Tucan.ai

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

  • On the other hand, integration with other systems could be complex.
  • Focus on the German market: This could limit the attractiveness for international law firms.

Benefits for legal practice

Tucan.ai offers specific advantages for legal practiceespecially through its ability to efficiently transcribe meetings and make this information accessible for later analysis. This makes it much easier to track meetings and automate workflows.

Decision guidance for law firms: Harvey.ai vs. Tucan.ai

In summary, both platforms offer valuable features for law firms and legal departments. While Harvey.ai impresses with its integration into existing systems, Tucan.ai offers a clear advantage for German-speaking users thanks to its GDPR compliance and versatile transcription capabilities.

Ultimately, the choice between these tools depends on the specific requirements of your law firm. For lawyers, law firm partners, CIOs, legal departments and innovation managers, we offer Tucan.ai is a tailor-made solution that not only guarantees data protection, but also revolutionizes work processes.

Experience the difference a specialized AI solution can make in your daily work and choose the tool that best suits your needs!

Are you ready to optimize the way you work?


AI in Legal Practice: Vetting and Implementing AI Solutions (2024 Guide)

In today's rapidly evolving legal landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing how law firms and legal departments operate. This guide explores the key considerations for legal professionals when vetting AI products and implementing AI systems within their organizations.

Table of Contents

Understanding AI Technologies in Legal Practice

AI technologies, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, are transforming the legal industry. However, it's crucial to understand both their capabilities and limitations.

Capabilities of LLMs

LLMs are primarily trained to generate sentences based on probability, rather than truly understanding text. In their standard versions, these models can accurately answer about 57% of complex legal questions, such as those related to tax law.

Enhancing Accuracy with RAG Systems

To improve accuracy, many legal AI solutions employ Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. These advanced systems can significantly boost performance:

Moreover, RAG systems allow for result verification by providing exact sources for generated information, adding an extra layer of reliability.

Challenges in AI Implementation

While AI offers numerous benefits, legal professionals must be aware of potential pitfalls when implementing these systems.

AI Hallucinations

AI hallucinations can occur due to several factors:

  • Unstructured data inputs (e.g., PDFs, images, complex contract constellations)
  • Unclear user prompts that require extensive background knowledge

Data Processing Hurdles

Effective AI implementation requires careful attention to data processing:

  • Content chunking across multiple documents is essential
  • Structured document labeling should be implemented where possible

Best Practices for AI Implementation

To successfully integrate AI into your legal practice, consider the following steps:

  1. Start with a well-defined use case, such as analyzing ICT contracts for DORA regulation compliance
  2. Define expected results and benchmarks to measure success
  3. Decide between external providers and internal systems, or a combination of both
  4. Test and expand gradually, for example, from DORA to GDPR contract analysis

Vetting AI Service Providers

When evaluating AI service providers, it's important to consider several factors:

  • Company history: How long have they been in the market?
  • Technology claims: Are they developing proprietary models or using existing ones?
  • Deployment options: Can their services be installed on-premise?

Building In-House AI Systems

For organizations considering in-house AI development, there are several key considerations:

Reshaping the Legal Industry

As AI continues to reshape the legal industry, it's crucial for lawyers, partners, legal departments, and CIOs to stay informed about the latest developments and best practices. By carefully vetting AI products and implementing robust systems, legal professionals can harness the power of AI to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and client service.

In conclusion, the integration of AI in legal practice offers immense potential, but it requires thoughtful consideration and strategic implementation. As we move forward, those who successfully navigate this technological shift will undoubtedly gain a competitive edge in the evolving legal landscape.

Ready to elevate your practice?


AI Implementation in Law Firms: 5 Essential Best Practices

In today's rapidly evolving legal landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an indispensable tool for law firms seeking to enhance efficiency and service quality. However, successful AI implementation requires careful planning and execution. Let's explore five crucial best practices for legal professionals looking to integrate AI into their practice.

Table of Contents

1. Start with a Well-Defined Use Case

The foundation of successful AI implementation lies in selecting a specific, manageable area of focus. For instance, analyzing ICT contracts for DORA regulation compliance provides a clear, bounded objective. When choosing your use case, consider the following:

  • Align it with your firm's strategic goals
  • Ensure it addresses a significant pain point
  • Consider the potential impact on workflows and client service

By starting with a focused approach, you can minimize risks and maximize learning opportunities.

2. Define Clear Expectations and Benchmarks

Setting measurable goals is crucial for evaluating the success of your AI implementation. To do this effectively, follow these steps:

  1. Establish specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  2. Create a baseline of current performance metrics
  3. Set realistic goals based on industry standards

Moreover, consider both quantitative metrics (e.g., time saved, accuracy rates) and qualitative factors (e.g., user satisfaction, client feedback) when defining your benchmarks.

3. Choose Between External Providers and Internal Systems

Deciding whether to build in-house or outsource your AI solution is a critical decision. To make an informed choice, weigh these factors:

  • In-house development offers greater control but requires significant resources
  • External providers can offer faster implementation but may provide less flexibility
  • A hybrid approach can combine external expertise with internal knowledge

Therefore, assess your firm's technical capabilities, budget constraints, and long-term AI strategy when making this decision.

4. Implement a Gradual Testing and Expansion Strategy

A phased approach to AI implementation allows for careful testing and refinement. To execute this strategy effectively:

  1. Begin with a limited pilot project
  2. Conduct thorough testing in a controlled environment
  3. Gather and analyze user feedback
  4. Develop a phased rollout plan for expansion

This approach allows you to make necessary adjustments and optimizations at each stage, ensuring a smoother overall implementation.

5. Invest in Training and Change Management

While not explicitly mentioned in the initial points, successful AI implementation heavily depends on user adoption and proficiency. To ensure this:

  • Provide comprehensive training for all users of the AI system
  • Develop clear guidelines and best practices for AI usage
  • Address potential resistance to change through education and demonstrating tangible benefits

By following these best practices, legal firms can create a solid foundation for successful AI implementation, ensuring that the technology enhances their practice while minimizing potential risks and disruptions.

In conclusion, remember that AI implementation is an ongoing process. Continuously monitor your system's performance, solicit feedback, and stay informed about emerging AI technologies to maintain a competitive edge in the legal industry.

Ready to elevate your practice?


AI Implementation in Legal Practice: Overcoming Challenges in 2024

In 2024, the legal profession stands at the cusp of a technological revolution driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI). As law firms and legal departments increasingly adopt AI solutions, it's crucial to understand and address the potential pitfalls that can arise during implementation. This article explores the key challenges in AI implementation for legal practices and provides actionable strategies to overcome them.

Table of Contents

AI Hallucinations: A Critical Concern

One of the most pressing challenges in AI implementation is the occurrence of AI hallucinations. These inaccuracies can significantly impact the reliability of AI-generated legal content and analysis.

Causes of AI Hallucinations: 

  • Unstructured data inputs, such as PDFs, images, and complex contract constellations
  • Unclear user prompts that require extensive background knowledge

Mitigation Strategies:

Data Processing Challenges

Effective AI implementation in legal practice hinges on robust data processing capabilities.

Key Requirements: 

  • Content chunking across multiple documents
  • Structured document labeling where possible

Solutions:

  1. Develop or adopt advanced chunking technologies that break up texts by topic
  2. Implement vector databases for efficient information retrieval and processing

Prompting Challenges

The quality of AI-generated outputs heavily depends on the clarity and specificity of user prompts.

Common Issues:

  • Unclear or ambiguous prompts lead to inaccurate results
  • Lack of context in user queries

Best Practices:

  1. Utilize a prompting cheat sheet to structure queries effectively
  2. Provide clear context and role instructions for the AI system
  3. Specify expected results and desired output format
  4. Consider implementing reranking systems to reformulate and analyze prompts for more relevant results

Ensuring Data Quality and Security

As legal practices handle sensitive information, maintaining data integrity and security is paramount when implementing AI systems.

Key Considerations:

  • Implementing robust data governance policies
  • Regular auditing and cleaning of data to improve AI performance
  • Employing strong security measures to protect confidential legal information

By addressing these challenges proactively, legal professionals can significantly enhance the accuracy, reliability, and security of their AI implementations. This approach leads to more effective and trustworthy AI-assisted legal work, ultimately improving efficiency and client service.

Ethical and Professional Considerations

As legal practices handle sensitive information, maintaining data integrity and security is paramount when implementing AI systems.

Key Considerations:

  • Transparency and explainability of AI-driven decision-making processes
  • Maintaining human oversight and accountability
  • Mitigating algorithmic bias to ensure fairness and equity

Strategies for Addressing Ethical Challenges:

  • Implement mechanisms for bias detection and algorithmic fairness
  • Ensure transparency in AI-driven processes and decisions
  • Maintain human oversight and intervention capabilities
  • Engage in ongoing ethical reflection and adaptation

Overcoming Resistance to Change

Resistance to change and fear of job displacement pose significant challenges to widespread AI adoption in legal practice.

Strategies for Addressing Resistance:

  • Provide comprehensive training and upskilling programs for legal professionals
  • Emphasize AI as a tool to augment human expertise rather than replace it
  • Demonstrate the benefits of AI in improving efficiency and reducing costs
  • Foster a culture of technological literacy and innovation within legal organizations

As the legal industry continues to embrace AI technologies, staying informed about these challenges and their solutions is crucial for successful implementation. By leveraging these strategies, law firms and legal departments can navigate the complexities of AI adoption and harness its full potential to transform their practice.

Ready to elevate your practice?


Automatic contract analysis in three simple steps.

Contract analyses can be time-consuming and complex. With our software, however, this process can be highly simplified. Let us show you how to analyze contracts quickly and efficiently inthree simple steps.

Step 1: Create a project and upload your contracts

Log in and create your project. Easily upload your contracts and documents to the software. Optionally, already linked document collections and databases can be added with a simple click.


Step 2: Have your contracts analyzed automatically

After uploading, you can start the automatic evaluation immediately. Our software analyzes your contracts at lightning speed and provides you with precise answers and detailed source information in just a few moments. If the answers do not meet your expectations, you can simply update them or have them analyzed again.

Especially useful: You can also use automatic evaluations according to predefined templates, for example for DORA third-party provider contracts.

Step 3: Export your results

Once you are satisfied with the analysis, you can simply export the results. Choose from various formats and download the results or send them directly by e-mail. One click is all it takes and your comprehensive contract analysis is ready for further processing or sharing.

With Tucan.ai, contract analysis becomes a quick and uncomplicated task. You save time and receive well-founded results. Simply try it out and see the efficiency and simplicity for yourself.

Start your AI-powered contract analysis now!


DORA | Management of ICT third party risks: Contract review and due diligence with AI

The management of ICT third-party risks is a central component of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Financial companies and their ICT service providers must ensure that their third-party providers also meet the requirements for digital resilience and security. In this blog post, we take a detailed look at contract review and due diligence and show how artificial intelligence (AI) can make these processes considerably easier and automate them as far as possible.


DORA Cheat Sheet: Contract review for ICT third party risks

Table of contents

Why is the management of ICT third-party risks important?

Third-party providers play a decisive role in the value chain of financial companies. They offer specialized services and technologies that are essential for operations. However, they also entail additional risks that need to be managed. An outage or security breach at a third-party provider can have a significant impact on the entire company.

1. Contract review

Goal of the contract review:

  • Ensure that all contracts with third-party providers contain clear provisions on ICT security and resilience.
  • Avoidance of risks due to unclear or inadequate contractual provisions.

Important contractual clauses:

  • Security requirements: Clear specifications of the security measures that the third-party provider must comply with.
  • Reporting of incidents: Obligation of the third-party provider to report ICT-related incidents immediately.
  • Review capabilities: The financial institution should have the ability to occasionally review the security practices of the third-party provider.
  • Continuity planning: arrangements to ensure business continuity in the event of ICT disruptions or failures.

Automated contract review with artificial intelligence (AI):

AI-powered contract review solutions can help you ensure that your contracts comply with DORA requirements. With Tucan.ai you can, for example:

  • Check contracts quickly and efficiently for security-relevant clauses.
  • Create detailed and automatic contract comparisons and subsumptions.
  • Save time and resources by reducing manual inspection processes.


DORA Cheat Sheet: Contract review for ICT third party risks

2. Due Diligence

Objective of the due diligence

  • Thorough review of the third party provider's ICT security practices and capabilities.
  • Ensure that the third-party provider is able to fulfill the contractually agreed security requirements.

Important steps in due diligence:

  • Security assessments: Conducting security assessments and audits at the third-party provider.
  • Risk assessment: Identification and assessment of potential risks that could arise from working with the third-party provider.
  • Continuous monitoring: Establish a system for continuous monitoring of the third-party provider's security practices.

Automated due diligence with artificial intelligence (AI):

With AI solutions such as Tucan.ai, you can significantly simplify and automate the due diligence process. You can, for example:

  • Perform automated identification and analysis of critical contract terms.
  • Reduce time and costs by minimizing manual checks in the due diligence process.
  • Quickly identify potential legal and financial risks in contractual documents.


DORA Cheat Sheet: Contract review for ICT third party risks

The ICT third-party risk management factor

Managing ICT third party risks is critical to complying with DORA requirements and ensuring your organization's digital resilience. Through thorough contract review and due diligence, you can ensure that your third-party providers meet high security standards.

Artificial intelligence can be used to make these processes efficient and effective. Use AI-powered solutions like Tucan.ai to optimize your contracts and due diligence practices and ensure your company is well prepared to meet the challenges of digital resilience.

About Tucan.ai

Tucan.ai is a leading provider in the field of legal tech and offers innovative solutions for contract analysis and review.. With Tucan.ai's AI-powered technology, you can save time and resources and ensure that your contracts comply with the latest legal requirements.

Stay prepared and secure the digital future!


Digital Operational Resilience Act: DORA implementation made easy

The implementation of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) poses new challenges for financial companies and their ICT service providers. This regulation aims to strengthen digital resilience and ensure that companies are able to respond effectively to ICT-related disruptions and threats. In this blog post, we provide you with an overview of the most important steps and measures for the successful implementation of DORA.


DORA Cheat Sheet: Contract review for ICT third party risks

Table of contents

1. Implement ICT risk management

A robust ICT risk management system is at the heart of DORA. Here are the essential steps:

  • Risk identification: Identify all potential ICT risks that could affect your company.
  • Risk assessment:Evaluate the identified risks in terms of their probability and potential impact.
  • Risk mitigation: Develop and implement measures to minimise the identified risks.
  • Monitoring and review: Continuously monitor the risks and regularly review the effectiveness of your risk minimisation measures.

2. Management of ICT third-party risks

Collaboration with third-party providers harbors additional risks. The following points should be noted:

  • Contract review: Ensure that all contracts with third-party providers contain clear provisions on ICT security and resilience.
  • Due diligence: Conduct a thorough review of the ICT security practices of your third-party providers.
  • Continuous monitoring: Regularly monitor the performance and security of your third-party providers.

3. Reporting of ICT-related incidents

A quick and effective response to ICT incidents is crucial:

  • Incident recording: Develop a system to record all ICT-related incidents.
  • Incident analysis: Analyze the incidents to identify the causes and develop measures to prevent future incidents.
  • Reporting: Report serious incidents immediately to the relevant authorities in accordance with DORA requirements.

4. Testing digital operational resilience

Regular testing is essential to ensure the resilience of your business:

  • Situation analyses: Consider conducting situational analyses to assess the efficiency of your ICT incident response processes.
  • Security checks: It may be helpful to occasionally call in external experts to check your systems for any vulnerabilities.
  • Vulnerability resolution: Fix identified vulnerabilities immediately and update your security measures.

5. Exchange of information between financial companies

Sharing information about threats and incidents can strengthen collective resilience:

  • Networks and platforms: Use networks and platforms to share information about ICT threats and incidents.
  • Best practices: Share best practices and lessons learned with other companies to increase resilience together.

6. Documentation and reporting

Thorough documentation and regular reporting are essential:

  • Documentation: Document all the measures you take to implement DORA.
  • Reporting: Prepare regular reports for management and the relevant authorities on the progress and results of your measures.

Support through artificial intelligence (AI)

Implementing DORA can be complex, but with the right tools and partners you can meet the requirements effectively. Tucan.ai offers innovative innovative contract analysis and review solutions to help you ensure that your contracts comply with DORA requirements. Use Tucan.ai's AI-supported technology to save time and resources and identify and eliminate potential risks at an early stage.


DORA Cheat Sheet: Contract review for ICT third party risks

Careful planning and implementation

The successful implementation of DORA requires careful planning and execution. By following the steps above, you can ensure that your company is well prepared to meet the new requirements and strengthen digital resilience. Use Tucan.ai's support to review your contracts and processes and ensure that you comply with the new regulations.

About Tucan.ai

Tucan.ai is a leading provider in the field of legal tech and offers innovative solutions for contract analysis and review.. With Tucan.ai's AI-powered technology, you can save time and resources and ensure that your contracts comply with the latest legal requirements.

Stay prepared and secure the digital future!


Privacy Preference Center

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.